Category: ERCx

In our previous blog post, where we introduced our new ERC-4626 test suite, we briefly described the specifications of an ERC-4626 vault and how we can leverage property tests to check that the vault satisfies the required properties stated in the EIP-4626. For this blog post, we use Version 2.2.0 of the ERC-4626 test suite and ERCx4626Mock0 to guide readers through and provide a visual reference.

Runtime Verification and Certora partnered to compare and evaluate a set of testing tools for DeFi applications. In Part 1 of this blog post, we introduced the testing tools. In Part 2, we focus on the bug-detection capabilities of these tools. Specifically, we evaluate and compare them against each other by using mutation testing using Gambit.

Explore the challenges of developing ERC tokens and delve into Runtime Verification's efforts to provide comprehensive test suites for the most popular ERC standards. Learn about their tools' capabilities, interfaces, and user-friendliness, and see how they compare to other offerings on the market.

Runtime Verification and Certora partnered to analyze a set of tools for detecting bugs in ERC-20 token contracts. In this series of two blog posts, we dive into the tools for detecting bugs in ERC-20 smart contracts.

How confident can we be in the behavior of the contracts? Do they follow the standards as required? With the permissionless nature of blockchains, anyone can write and deploy smart contracts in blockchain ecosystems. Thus, it is important to check that they conform to the standard requirements as stated in their respective ERC standard.

ERCx can be used to check for a contract's security and reusability, but it can also help you develop your own contract that inherits desirable behaviors. In that respect, ERCx favors composability and ensures assumptions are correct.